Q: How do you typically spend the holidays (when you're not busy with CORAS work, of course!)?
A: Sleeping, when that small luxury occurs between school and work. Smoking a government-sanctioned joint. Pretending I don’t need to mop my floors.
Q: What are some supplies allies can donate that most people wouldn’t think of?
A: Safe sex supplies, condoms, sex sponges, etc. Things for new mothers like formula, prenatal vitamins (things we can’t access from the city as we aren’t a health organisation). Laundry detergent is a big one as many use laundromats.
Old phones and laptops allow workers to transition to online/indoor work, and we struggle to get those.
Cat stuff. Whores really love their cats.
Q: How can prospective donors and volunteers make sure the nonprofit they're supporting is truly aligned with the needs and experiences of sex workers?
A: Look at who is actually running it and who benefits from their work. If sex workers are not on the board, in leadership, salaried (ESPECIALLY salaried, so many love to prop up sex workers for shock factor but not actually pay them for their work), or otherwise actively shaping the organization’s programming, that’s a red flag. Exit-based organization/abolitionist groups/etc often speak over workers instead of with them, which is upsetting as conflating sex workers with trafficking survivors both removes workers’ autonomy and minimizes the harm done to survivors. We would never compare a victim of labor trafficking to a college barista, and the same shouldn’t apply here.
Exit based groups do effectively nothing for sex workers looking for safety. CORAS is innovative in that we help both women exiting the sex trade - alongside those that aren’t. Acknowledging that consenting sex workers exist is integral to helping lift stigma.
A trustworthy organization will be transparent, will use non-stigmatizing language, and will focus on safety, autonomy, and legitimate support- not “rescuing” workers or pushing moral Judgments.
Also, an organisation that can’t provide more support than a bullshit half hour counselling session with an inexperienced volunteer while their director is making six figures, I’d probably avoid. This isn’t even targeted - there seem to be so many organisations on the sunshine list that can’t seem to offer more than a can of dented corn in a fancy office to their communities. The best way to assess alignment is simple: are sex workers paid, at the table, and are their voices shaping the decisions?